I actually created a GoogleDocs accou...

I actually created a GoogleDocs account about four months ago, because a number of library customers were using it & I wanted to know more.

 

I like the idea of being able to access my documents from any computer with Internet access. If I trusted the Internet more (and thought it wouldn't go kaput at any moment) I'd probably use this for my graduate school papers, especially my thesis. I get sick of carrying around my thumb drive and working on it from computer to computer, or emailing it to myself to work on another computer.

 

BUT. Does it do footnotes? Let's see.¹ 

I guess my basic point with GoogleDocs is: if I'm already comfortable with Word, and it works for me, and I don't REALLY need to access my documents anywhere else, why do GoogleDocs?

---

1. Well, sort of. But not like what I need in my thesis.
    

I played, I saw, I gave up (#17)

Eh. Perhaps because it wasn't a real collaborative project but more like an exercise (which is fine, since that's what "sandboxes" are supposed to be in part), doing the PB wiki thing didn't do all that much for me.

I'd much rather plan a camping trip, a la the Common Craft video, in a wiki! :)

"Wiki wiki" = the sound Fozzie the Bear makes

I actually found this step (#16, if I'm counting correctly) to be really fascinating, since I thought I already knew everything there was to know about wikis and discovered -- as I tend to do -- that I don't know jack.

So here's my first reaction: THERE ARE SO MANY COOL WIKIS OUT THERE!!! Revised: there are so many cool LIBRARY wikis out there! I'm so freaking impressed with Jennifer Greb's Ambient Librarian wiki, and the Library Success one, and the ten others I dipped into. Wow!

Here's my second reaction: Holy crap, I'm having a hard time reading all of these!!!

What is wrong with me? Alas, I think I am just a printed text kind of gal. I found myself exploring, and reading, and following, and underneath it all, really really really REALLY wanting to print it all out so I could read it. And wouldn't it be nice if I could take all of those pages and put them together, like, in a kind of binding, so to speak. Oh, and if we put some kind of hard cover on it...

See where I'm going? Books. I can only seem to read in-depth informational things when they are printed on paper, best when they are in books.

At any rate, I'm on board with wikis. I really love the concept of sharing information and collaborating with others on certain topics, and I love the CommonCraft videos that are linked to in the 23 Things blog that simplify these ideas without getting rid of essential information.

And I'm old. I don't know if I will ever be as comfortable reading words on a screen as I am reading them on a page.

#15 -- Grumpy Young(ish) Woman... sort of / Librarian 1.5

I am totally aware that many I have appeared, in many of my blog posts, as someone who eschews the delights of technology -- even pooh-poohs it, grumpily rails against it, etc. Call it Grumpy Young(ish) Woman, 1.0.

But honestly, I'm excited by many of the ideas of both Web 2.0 and "Library 2.0" because of the possibilities they present to really help connect people to ideas and books and good stuff like that. Blogs and wikis and tagging and everything seem like a CONTINUATION of the coolest parts of library history: of libraries being innovative in connecting with people and giving them what they need to grow as human beings. I'm particularly wondering if we can include "tagging" to our catalog entries... that seems like an immediately useful idea waiting to happen.

I like what the icebergs guy says about changing or refining our tools to be super-easy for users to, you know, use. I like this: "We have to...find new ways to bring our services to patrons rather than insisting that they come to us -- whether physically or virtually." There is a lot of wisdom in that, and I'm on board for pushing libraries in that direction.

And then I get to the ponytail guy (seriously, dude; ponytails were icky WAY BACK IN 1997... but it's 2009 now!!! ... cut it OFF) and his thoughts about becoming a "Librarian 2.0", and that's all cool stuff, too, mostly, though I believe I'm more of a Librarian 1.5 kinda gal. (I don't "embrace" Web 2.0 tools but I use some of them okay...) He has many useful things to say about not using technology just to use technology and keeping up with trends outside of library world, which make sense and should be listened to.

Oops.. that was actually #14

Crap. That was #14. One to go, Joe.

#13... almost done with this batch

Racing toward the end of the 7 thru 14 things... really want to win that $50 Amazon card...

ANYWAY. Okay -- Technorati. Well, I explored it and found some interesting things, some okay things, and then just some things. What does it mean that the #1 search is for "taskbar"? So people are really interested in reading blogs that address the topic of "taskbar"? Weird. Other top searches were for "Jennifer Garner" (okay, I get that) and "Men". Huh.

So many blogs... So much writing out there, but who is reading? I taught English for a few years back in the dark ages, and it troubled me then, too (pre-Internets, pre-blog, pre-alla this stuff): there are so many people who think they can write but don't bother to read. Gee, what a concept: a librarian (okay, an almost-librarian) whining about the populace not reading. But seriously... it just seems like another way for people to get all navel-gazey and tunnel-visiony. Egoist. Blah blah.

The end of this latest rant. Sorry.

#13

I've known about Delicious for awhile, but once again, I just didn't find the energy or gumption or memory to use it. Great idea, can totally see the usefulness, but... I probably won't.

There are just too many danged electronic tools out there, and as good as they all might be, I can't use them all. Is there a tool to organize all of the tools?